Archive for the 'Estate Planning' Category
Litigation over Noncompete Agreements
Agreements between employers and their employees prohibiting or restricting competition by a departing employee are nothing new, but their use is growing-and not just for the highest levels of management. This trend makes it all the more important to understand the limits that courts have placed on such agreements, with a view toward balancing employers’ interests with policies favoring competition and unfettered opportunities for individuals to pursue their livelihoods. ‘While courts have sometimes struck down noncompete agreements in their entirety, occasionally they effectively have rewritten parts of an agreement, a practice known as “blue penciling,” so as to fix offending parts while retaining acceptable provisions.
No commentsCharitable Remainder Trusts
As the name implies, a charitable remainder trust involves the transfer of assets to a trust with the income going to an individual or individuals (which can include the owner of the assets) and with a charity receiving the assets at the expiration of the trust period. Such a trust device benefits the individuals who are the objects of the property owner’s generosity, it transfers assets to the property owner’s preferred charities, and it yields tax savings for the property owner. Read more
No commentsLife Insurance Policy Rescinded
A business executive was answering questions for an application for a $3 million life insurance policy that named as the beneficiary a company be had started with others. He answered in the negative when asked the common question as to whether he “[e]ngaged in auto, motorcycle or boat racing, parachuting, skin or scuba diving, skydiving, or hang gliding or other hazardous avocation or hobby.” In fact, on about 20 occasions, the executive had gone heli-skiing, which involves skiing down remote mountain trails after being dropped off by a helicopter. Read more
No commentsBonus Plan May Trigger Overtime
The federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) provides that employers may not require their employees to work more than 40 hours per work week unless those employees receive overtime compensation at a rate of not less than one and one-half times their regular pay. The FLSA contains certain exemptions from the overtime compensation requirement, one of which is for employees working in a “bona fide executive, administrative, or professional capacity.” In other words, if an employee works in such a capacity, the employer is exempt from the general requirement of paying overtime pay. Under the FLSA regulations, an employee’s position must satisfy three tests to qualify for this exemption: (1) a duties test, (2) a salary level test, and (3) a salary-basis test. Read more
No commentsCaregiver Bias
Today, it is commonplace for workers to handle both work and caregiving responsibilities for spouses and children, parents and other older family members, or relatives with disabilities. Women still are disproportionately more likely to exercise primary caregiving responsibilities but, in increasing numbers, men also have assumed the dual roles of caretaker and breadwinner. Read more
No commentsFall 2009 Report from Counsel here!
Gender stereotyping can lead to law suits under the Family Medical Leave Act. “Caregiver Bias”
A recent federal appeals court decision required an employer to pay overtime compensation to salaried workers due to the employer’s performance-based bonus compensation plan.“Bonus Plan May Trigger Overtime”
Adventure sports and other hazardous hobbies can lead to the loss of life insurance benefits. “Life Insurance Policy Rescinded”
A substantial verdict was awarded the victim of repeated identity theft schemes for the negligence of a credit reporting agency. “$200,000 for Identity Theft Victim”
Charitable Remainder Trusts can be a useful tax-planning tool. “Charitable Remainder Trusts”
Congress has enacted temporary changes to coverage by FDIC Insurance. “FDIC Insurance Update”
No commentsEstate Planning for Vacation Homes
Whether it is a palatial estate where Rockefellers and Vanderbilts would feel at home or a rustic cabin in the woods complete with an outhouse, a family vacation home often carries sentimental value that doesn’t show up on financial ledgers. That is all the more reason why owners of such homes should plan for the orderly transfer of the home for future generations. With the help of some professional guidance, owners can choose from a variety of options tailored to particular situations and priorities.
- Outright sale of the property to a third party is simplest, but be prepared for substantial capital gains if the property has been in the family long enough to appreciate in value.
- A simple bequest can be used to keep the home in the family, but, by itself, it may not address issues such as use and maintenance.
- A trust, in particular a Qualified Personal Residence Trust, has some tax benefits. The grantor gifts the property but retains a right to use it for a definite term. The value of the gift is calculated as the value of the property, less the retained interest. However, if the grantor does not outlive the retained term, the property will be included in the grantor’s estate.
- A limited liability company (LLC) has the benefit of protecting assets generally. If someone is injured on the property, the owner’s liability would be confined to the ownership interest in the property.
- A partnership has the advantage of a formal structure, but each partner would have to contribute.
The issues that arise most often for second and subsequent generations concern how to allocate both the benefits and the burdens of the vacation home, that is, the use of the home and the expenses of the home, including maintenance, insurance, and taxes. The benefits and burdens can be spelled out in writing in as much detail as is desired, but it is not advisable to leave these matters to chance. There is the potential for discord and bruised feelings in even the most congenial families if for example, one sibling is left out of the prime vacation times while shouldering more than his or her share of costs for maintenance and repair. Parents might head off at least some of these issues by setting up an endowment to cover ongoing expenses for the home.
Looking a bit farther down the road, whatever legal forms are used should provide a means by which one or more of the family members can sell his or her interest in the home to the remaining family members. Considering that there may be honest disagreement as to the property’s value, it makes sense to look for consensus by using two separate appraisals, one arranged for by the selling family member and one by the remaining owner or owners.
No commentsRoth 401(k)s
It has become more common for employers to offer not only conventional 401 (k) retirement plans, but, since they became available in 2006, also Roth 401(k) plans.
For 2009, an employee can put away a total of up to $16,500 in a 401 (k) plan. If the employee is at least 50 years old or will be before the end of the year, the maximum contribution rises to $22,000 because of a “catch up” contribution of up to $5,500. The total contribution may be allocated between 401(k) and Roth 401(k) accounts. In fact, the prevailing view is that it is a good idea to have some money in both types of plans because doing so will yield benefits from a diversified exposure to taxes. Read more
No commentsSummer 2009 Report from Counsel
“E-Mails Can Modify Contracts” informs of the possible ramifications of agreements made informally via email.
“Roth 401(k)s” discusses the differences between Roth and Traditional 401(k) plans.
“New Identity Theft rules Affect Businesses” outlines new precautions financial institutions and creditors should take to prevent abuses, and potential ramifications of noncompliance.
“Religous Land-Use Lawsuits” discusses several disputes between zoning officials and religious organizations.
“Cold Feet Cost Groom $150,000” discusses damages awarded one woman a resulting from her grooms reneged marriage proposal.
“Estate Planning for Vacation Homes” offers several strategies for preventing infighting amongst heirs over vacation properties.
Winter 2008/2009 Report from Counsel
IMPORTANT NOTICE TO PERSONS DOMICILED IN ILLINOIS CONCERNING ILLINOIS ESTATE TAXES IMPOSED ON ESTATES OF PERSONS WHO DIE IN YEAR 2009:
Illinois is “decoupling” from the year 2009 federal estate tax exclusion amount of $3,500,000. This may result in substantial Illinois estate taxes if your estate for tax purposes exceeds $2,000,000. We suggest that you consider early in 2009, the interaction of federal and Illinois estate tax laws on your estate planning documents with us or with another lawyer of your choice who practices in the area of estate planning.
“Business Start-Up Checklist” discusses important questions would-be entrepreneurs should ask themselves prior to starting a new business (note: the idiom “carrying coals to Newcastle” means spending an inordinate amount of energy on something useless, fruitless, or redundant – Newcastle, England was a major coal exporter).
“Age Discrimination in Employment” reviews a recent decision by the Supreme Court that puts the onus on employers to prove its policies are based on reasonable factors other than age when defending age discrimination claims.
“All in the Family–Father Wins $4 Million from Daughter“concerns a recent court decision concerning a business dispute between family members.
“Generation-Skipping Trusts” reminds us that GSTs are not only for wealthy families, and discusses various advantages and disadvantages of GSTs as part of an estate plan.
“New Nonprofit Tax Forms” describes new instructions and filing requirements for Internal Revenue Service Form 990 for nonprofit organizations.
“Careful What You Click” describes potential legal hassles involved with online agreements.